![]() ![]() Feb. 15, 2022
Good morning. The jury is still out on Sarah Palin’s defamation case against the New York Times, but U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff has made up his mind. We’ve got the latest from the court, and a snapshot of the judge. Plus, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary is back in court today to defend a bankruptcy strategy that plaintiffs’ lawyers declared “rotten.” The ABA's House of Delegates backs accommodations for lactating women, and Facebook and its lawyers at Gibson Dunn could soon face a sanctions bid in a privacy class action. It’s Tuesday, and we’re on a roll. Let’s jump in!
![]() REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz The Manhattan federal judge’s plan to dismiss Sarah Palin’s defamation complaint against the New York Times — while the jury was deliberating — was unusual but reasonable and will likely hold up on appeal, a legal expert told Reuters. "It is very difficult for plaintiffs to prevail in defamation cases," Gautam Hans, a Vanderbilt University Law professor, said. "That's one reason you see some antipathy toward the current state of the law, including from some Supreme Court justices."
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff concluded that the Times, in the editorial at the center of Palin’s lawsuit, did not maliciously link the former Republican Alaska governor and 2008 Republican U.S. vice presidential candidate to a mass murder, our colleagues Jody Godoy and Jonathan Stempel report.
Rakoff plans to enter a formal dismissal after jurors reach their own verdict. The 2nd Circuit "would greatly benefit from knowing how the jury would decide it," Rakoff said. The judge said he was "not altogether happy" about dismissing Palin’s complaint. He called the op-ed "an example of very unfortunate editorializing on the part of the Times." Rakoff added: "My job is to apply the law. The law here sets a very high standard for actual malice, and in this case the court finds that that standard has not been met.”
Hello, Daily Docket readers! We're exploring ways to give you more of the legal news you want, and we'd like your input. Please take a minute to fill out this survey to tell us what we’re doing right, and what you think should change. Thank you!
![]() REUTERS/Callaghan O'Hare A dearth of clear policies and accommodations for breastfeeding mothers is yet another barrier women face in the legal profession. That’s the message the American Bar Association’s House of Delegates heard Monday before overwhelmingly approving a resolution urging legal employers, law schools, bar examiners and bar associations to provide “reasonable and accessible” accommodations for lactating women, Karen Sloan reports.
All too often, women are forced to pump in inconvenient or unsanitary spaces such as bathroom stalls, proponents told delegates. The ABA in 2019 urged courthouses to add lactation rooms, and now it’s time for other corners of the industry to step up and do better, they said. That includes one “off the clock” 30-minute break every three hours; a private or semiprivate place to pump that is not a bathroom; and clear signage directing people to the accommodation area, according to the resolution. And mothers should be allowed to bring pumps into bar exam and law school testing rooms.
“This is a matter of access to this profession and dignity for our colleagues,” said Kentucky lawyer Michelle Browning Coughlin, founder of the nonprofit advocacy group Mothers Esquire.
Industry buzz
Number of the day: ![]() REUTERS/Dado That’s the amount that a subsidiary of crypto company BlockFi has agreed to pay the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and 32 states to settle charges in connection with a retail crypto lending product the New Jersey company offered to nearly 600,000 investors. BlockFi, represented by Steven Peikin, head of Sullivan & Cromwell’s securities enforcement and investigation practice, neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s allegations. Read more about the settlement.
Columnist spotlight: Sanctions threat looms for Facebook and Gibson Dunn in privacy class action At a hearing last week in a class action accusing Facebook of selling user data to Cambridge Analytica and other business partners, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said he was strongly inclined to make the company — and its lawyers — pay for “stonewalling” plaintiffs on hotly contested discovery. Alison Frankel got hold of a transcript of the hearing. Her take: Facebook and its lawyers are learning that fierce litigation tactics can provoke equally fierce blowback. Check out other recent pieces from all our columnists: Alison Frankel, Jenna Greene and Hassan Kanu.
"The cases they brought against professors had nothing to do with spying or espionage. It was simply racial profiling."
—U.S. Representative Ted Lieu, Democrat of California, remarking about a series of U.S. Justice Department cases against professors launched in 2018 under the label “China Initiative.” The DOJ is completing a review of the initiative, which was aimed at combating Chinese espionage and trade secret theft. Former officials and critics of the initiative said they expect the DOJ’s examination will result in a shift away from targeting academic researchers, our colleagues Sarah Lynch, Nate Raymond and Jane Lanhee Lee report. Read more about the collapse of several cases and blowback from civil rights groups
Coming up today
In the courts
Industry moves
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised myriad ethics questions for lawyers, writes Sateesh Nori of The Legal Aid Society. Should attorneys share information with clients about masks, vaccines and public health policies? Should attorneys encourage our clients to get vaccinated? Plus, Nori writes, ethical duties to protect privacy and avoid conflicts of interest raise questions around knowing the vaccination status of a client. Read more about the ethics questions in play, and what factors should help to guide lawyers.
Want more legal news?
Contact and follow us
Karen Sloan karen.sloan@thomsonreuters.com
Mike Scarcella mike.scarcella@thomsonreuters.com
Thanks for reading The Daily Docket. Invite friends to subscribe here.
Contact us with feedback.
Copyright © 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 610 Opperman Drive, Eagan, MN 55123
Want to change how you receive these emails? |