![]() ![]()
Good morning. Welcome back to The Daily Docket, your go-to morning newsletter from Westlaw Today for the latest on courts, lawyers and the legal profession. Oracle and Google are facing off at SCOTUS, a U.S. House antitrust panel is blasting Big Tech, Paul Weiss says no to pandemic bonuses and a MoFo associate has career advice on TikTok. It's Wednesday, what could go wrong?
Were you forwarded this email? Subscribe here.
Oracle, Google face off at top court in multi-billion dollar IP feud ![]() REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann A long-running $8 billion-plus lawsuit by Oracle accusing Google of infringing the tech company's copyrights to build its Android smartphone operating system is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court today in a case IP lawyers say could shape the level of copyright protection afforded to software.
A shorthanded, eight-justice court will hear Google's appeal of a Federal Circuit ruling reviving the lawsuit alleging it copied thousands of lines of computer code from Oracle's Java programming language without a license to make Android, which runs most of the world's smartphones, Jan Wolfe reports.
Goldstein & Russell's Thomas Goldstein and Orrick's E. Joshua Rosenkranz will make their arguments for Google and Oracle, respectively, by phone, the new-school method the centuries-old court has adopted to hear cases amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Google argues the shortcut commands it copied into Android do not deserve copyright protection because they promote software innovation by helping developers write programs to work across platforms. Even if they could be copyrighted, Google says the "fair use" defense to copyright infringement, which protects copying that transforms an original copyrighted work, holds since its copying resulted in a new smartphone platform. Read more.
Paul Weiss says associate bonuses don't 'feel right' amid client economic troubles ![]() REUTERS/Andrew Kelley Major New York law firms have rushed recently to reward associates with special bonuses of up to $40,000 for their work during the coronavirus pandemic. But Paul Weiss will not be joining the club, with its chairman saying the perks are not appropriate at a time when clients are under financial pressure, Caroline Spiezio reports.
"So many of our clients and others across our community are experiencing unprecedented economic trauma, including the shuttering of their businesses and the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs, as a direct result of this pandemic," he wrote.
The decision is in contrast to a trend among its Wall Street peers like Sullivan & Cromwell and Simpson Thacher that have decided to match a $7,500 to $40,000 bonus range set by Davis Polk. Kirkland & Ellis and Cravath are similarly sitting-out the bonus race. Get the full scoop.
Industry buzz: Big firms forge ahead with captive alternative legal service providers, and more
A growing number of law firms have created "captive" alternative legal service providers -- entities within law firms to compete with outside providers that are making gains in the market, according to a report by legal industry advisory firm Baretz+Brunelle.
Looking at the Am Law 100 and Global 100 law firms combined, 48 firms have created these business units, which use technology to increase efficiency in areas such as e-discovery, due diligence and contract review, Sara Merken reports.
Elsewhere in the legal profession...
We want to provide you the best legal news in the industry. Please take a few minutes to complete a short survey on how you use our content and what else you'd like to see.
It's not like 'Suits.' MoFo associate takes law mentorship to TikTok
![]() Source: Morrison & Foerster Is being a lawyer like being on the show "Suits?" Not really, but it's the most common question Morrison & Foerster associate Cecillia Xie gets on her TikToks where, with more than 95,000 followers, she serves up some real talk on topics like the LSAT, student debt and post-grad career paths.
Coming up today
"To put it simply, companies that once were scrappy, underdog startups that challenged the status quo have become the kinds of monopolies we last saw in the era of oil barons and railroad tycoons."
The U.S. House Judiciary Committee's Antitrust Subcommittee in 449-page report that describes instances where Google, Apple, Amazon.com and Facebook misused their power to maintain dominance. The report found they use "killer acquisitions" to smite rivals, charged exorbitant fees, and forced small businesses into "oppressive" contracts. (Reuters)
In the courts
Industry moves
Columnist spotlight: Why Netflix and Hulu really, really want this Texas class action to be dismissed ![]() Do Netflix and Hulu owe a portion of their revenues to cities and towns across Texas, Nevada and Ohio? Three class actions allegethe streaming giants do, claiming that state laws requiring cable operators and "video service providers" to register with the state and pay a franchise fee in return for their use of public land for wires and cables apply to the companies. Netflix and Hulu have filed motions to dismiss, and Alison Frankel takes a look at their arguments: Netflix’s lawyers at Latham & Watkins decried the "radical implications" of the class action’s "drastic" interpretation of the Texas law. Hulu, represented by Wilson Sonsini, argued that the Texas plaintiffs' theory "represents a dramatic expansion of internet taxation" that would force every video content provider, from CBS and HBO to TikTok, to pass fees onto their users. Read the full column here.
Lawyer speak: Is timekeeping for government contractors material under the False Claims Act? Over the past several years, there have been a number of high-profile FCA settlements for alleged timekeeping deficiencies, ranging from $13 million to more than $30 million. Despite these settlements, a recent case in the Southern District of New York involving falsified timekeeping handed a win to a government contractor. Potomac Law Group partner Derek Adams explores whether or not the case, which is being appealed to the 2nd Circuit, gives new hope to government contractors and grantees fighting claims of FCA violations.
Correction: An item yesterday about how Davis Wright Tremaine is considering options that better match remote work misspelled the firm's name.
Want more legal news?
Contact and follow us
Nate Raymond nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com
Caitlin Tremblay caitlin.tremblay@thomsonreuters.com
Thanks for reading The Daily Docket. Invite friends to subscribe here.
Contact us with feedback.
Copyright © 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 610 Opperman Drive, Eagan, MN 55123
Want to change how you receive these emails? |