Recruiter to cooperate in deal with workers suing major shipbuilders
A General Dynamics sign is shown at the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in San Diego, California, U.S. October 17, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Blake Purchase Licensing Rights
March 27 (Reuters) - A maritime industry recruiter has agreed to work with plaintiffs and share worker compensation data in a lawsuit accusing major U.S. shipbuilders of limiting employee mobility, marking the first settlement in the case.
Attorneys for a proposed class of engineers and architects suing General Dynamics (GD.N), Huntington Ingalls (HII.N) and other companies disclosed the settlement with Faststream Recruitment on Tuesday in Alexandria, Virginia federal court.
The October lawsuit said the shipbuilders violated U.S. antitrust law by scheming to restrict hiring from each other in a conspiracy that suppressed worker pay.
General Dynamics, Huntington and others have denied any wrongdoing and have asked a judge to dismiss the lawsuit.
UK-based Faststream, which was also named as a defendant, will not pay any money as part of its settlement. It agreed to share communications, surveys and data relating to compensation and benefits from 2000 to present for some naval engineers and marine architects.
The deal to dismiss Faststream from the case requires court approval.
Attorneys for Faststream and the plaintiffs had no immediate comment. The company did not admit liability. Representatives from General Dynamics and Huntington did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Faststream focuses on the recruitment in the global maritime, shipping and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1999 and employs more than 100 people, according to its website.
The lawsuit said Faststream “abided by the no-poach rules agreed to by the defendants and facilitated unlawful information exchanges among the defendants that helped them enforce their no-poach conspiracy.”
Shana Scarlett, an attorney for the plaintiffs, in a court filing on Tuesday said the settlement provides “substantial” cooperation benefits, and “it avoids the risks, costs, and delay of continuing protracted litigation against Faststream.”
The case is Scharpf v. General Dynamics, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, No. 1:23-cv-01372.
For plaintiffs: Steven Toll of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll; Shana Scarlett of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro; and George Farah of Handley Farah & Anderson
For Faststream: Nathan Eimer of Eimer Stahl and Lynn Brugh of Williams Mullen
Read more:
Sign up here.
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
