Nearly 100 days into what Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk have called a mission to make the federal bureaucracy more efficient, Reuters found 20 instances where the staff and funding cuts led to purchasing bottlenecks and increased costs, paralysis in decision-making, longer public wait times, higher-paid civil servants filling in menial jobs, and a brain drain of scientific and technological talent.
"DOGE is not a serious exercise," said Jessica Riedl, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute — a fiscally conservative think tank that supports streamlining government. She estimates DOGE has only saved $5 billion to date, and believes it will end up costing more than it saves.
The examples — previously unreported — span 14 government agencies and were described in Reuters interviews with three dozen federal workers, union representatives and governance experts.
Read the full story ➡️ https://reut.rs/4lS5g79